Many people are flocking to one source for COVID-19 updates.
Readers of articles in medical journals increased 557% between March and July 2019 and March to July 2020, although the total number of articles published per month remained unchanged. , according to research published on the JAMA Network Open, a monthly open-access medical journal published. by the American Medical Association.
Between allegations of social media prejudice and political bias among mainstream publications, the researchers checked Full and PDF views of articles published by three widely read, English-language, general medical journals – JAMA, The New England Journal of Medicine, and BMJ (British Medical Journal).
The COVID-19 pandemic increased overall article views for major medical journals by 2020, with an unprecedented per-article views of related publications, the researchers concluded. to COVID-19, ”concluded the researchers. In fact, they say their analysis shows that original research articles that do not contain COVID-19 alone are receiving the same pre-pandemic attention.
‘The COVID-19 pandemic has increased overall article views for major medical journals by 2020, with unprecedented per-article views for publications related to COVID-19.’
It shows that people are more interested to seek medical information from scientists. “This work began to address the question of how the COVID-19 pandemic affected attention to other diseases in medical literature. These findings may be limited by different approaches to pageview reporting and the number of articles published between the journals studied. “
However, most Americans believe that the COVID-19 situation in the US is improving, despite evidence of increased cases, with Concern about coronavirus is low not seen since April 2020 during the first pandemic. US President Joe Biden told reporters in a recent speech: “This is not the time to ease our efforts.”
Earlier this month, Google
said they would contribute € 25 million ($ 29.3 million) to the newly formed European Information and Communication Foundation to fight fake news. The tech giants face legal pressure in Europe over content hosted on their platforms, especially articles related to the coronavirus pandemic and the US presidential election of May. 11 years ago.
Twitter and Facebook
pledged to take a more positive stance on fake news on their websites, and both platforms permanently suspended Donald Trump’s account in January of last year after he was accused of inciting Deadly rebellion at the US Capitol. The former president denied he did so in several Facebook posts before being officially banned.
The ‘confirmation bias’ helps outrageous theories and reports gain traction on social media. And there, psychologists say, is where fake news comes in.
The mainstream media has been opposed in the previous administration. Trump is often labeled “fake” news agencies that have criticized his administration, but he also describes CNN.
United States: CBS
and the New York Times
Many news stores today Regularly check out storiessuch as those involving shootings at a massage parlor in Atlanta last month and undocumented immigrants entering the US along the southern border, although these stories have been widely shared on social networks. And CNN also did a reality check President Biden’s first press conference at the White House.
This 2019 study found that Republicans over 65 are more likely to share fake news. Findings suggest a need for “new attention” to educate “specific vulnerable individuals” about fake news or misinformation that appears to be a peer-reviewed article. evidence by a legitimate and fact-based media, the study said.
So why are young explorers inclined to share fake news on Facebook? One theory: When they don’t grow up with technology, they may be more likely to be fooled. Case in point: variety of cheat success was achieved with older Americans who were unfamiliar with how computers and technology worked.
Younger Americans growing up with the Internet, regardless of their political tendencies, tend to be less likely to be overwhelmed by stories across their news sources on Facebook and Twitter.
and be more adept at detecting signs of fake news. But they were also attacked by news, real and fake, of pandemic relevance. Early pandemic messages must differentiate COVID-19 from influenza.
“Confirm bias” helps Whimsical theories and reports have gained traction on social media. And there, psychologists say, is where fake news comes in. With so much fuss on social media, how can people tell what is a rumor and what is real? Psychologists say that humans develop defense mechanisms to deal with an uncertain world from the very beginning in life. Peer-reviewed studies may be helpful.