A better integration process is a more viable and feasible route than Japan abruptly upgrading its membership.
Radomes at Menwith Hills Surveillance Station in North Yorkshire, UK.
Credit: Flickr / Tom Blackwell
Five Eyes, a 75-year-old intelligence alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the United States, may soon see greater cooperation with Japan, as rumors of joint expansion minh once again appeared.
In a recent interview with Sydney Morning HeraldJapan Ambassador to Australia Yamagami Shingo said hopefully “this idea will come true in the near future”. Adding that he is “very optimistic about the near future” and “sky is the limit” for the Australia-Japan relationship.
Expanding rumors have long surrounded the intelligence alliance and it has maintained high-level cooperation with many other countries. Any step forward in joining, however, will require Japan and the other members to overcome a myriad of challenges, and the reality may not yet be the way.
The risk lies in the “high barriers” that Japan is forced to overcome, like tell by Akita Hiroyuki. Japan needs to strengthen its domestic security apparatus and ensure it is able to provide valuable insights to hypothetical “Six Eyes” partners. Akita added that not being a member can lead to disappointment and arousing trust among other members.
Ankit Panda and Jagannath Panda words Center for Strategic and International Studies points to the longevity and sustainability of Five Eyes rooted in “decades of cultural and bureaucratic synergies between the five constituent nations”.
It should be expected that any new official additions will actually come step by step and not through any rapid increase in membership. If Japan is given the green light in any way, a more likely outcome is that it will join the official “5 + 1” format. This will allow it to gradually ease deeper cooperation.
In 2013 leaks from Edward Snowden, it was revealed that Five Eyes maintained what was described as sharing secondary and tertiary intelligence with other nations. Other known groups include one focused on the pariah state of North Korea, which has clashed with France, Japan, and South Korea.
Bringing Japan to the Five Eyes group will mainly focus on the growing threats of China and North Korea. How Beijing sees such an openness can be seen in the lens expressed by the state media about the group.
In February, the Global Times, the mouthpiece of the Chinese state Labeling Five Eyes is an “axis of white supreme power”. It went on to say, “Such an axis is intended to undermine international relations and allow hoolism to rise to the diplomatic stage in the 21st century.”
Over the past few days, Global Times piece of comments seeks to take advantage of the Five Eyes tensions that New Zealand thinks about the intelligence group’s expansion, accusing the US of undermining its solidarity by using human rights “as a cover to suppress and repress. Beijing and its allies ”. It concludes that any attempt to incorporate Japan into the Five Eyes fold will not be worth it.
Speaking of the alliance’s interests, Rory Medcalf, director of the College of National Security at the Australian National University, calls it the “force factor”.
The incorporation of Japan into Five Eyes will give the alliance a new and valuable anchor in Northeast Asia. By gradually integrating a like-minded democracy like Japan through a tightly controlled membership and membership process, Five Eyes members can effectively prevent the greatest risks. membership expansion: gradually building trust, minimizing leakage and ensuring the standard and quality of contributions from a country that in time could become the coalition’s sixth member .