The Princess of Wales has been at the center of controversy as an interview with BBC Panorama showed her revealing private details about her broken marriage with Prince Charles. In the landmark conversation, Diana admitted “there were three of us in this marriage, so it’s a bit crowded”, alluding to Charles’s deliberate infidelity.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been compared to the late Duchess after interviews with Ms. Winfrey revealed they made serious allegations regarding the Royal Family.
However, according to one royal expert, the pair is not as relevant as Princess Diana when it comes to their position within the Company.
Harry and Meghan had given up on their royal duties by the time their interview aired, according to royal author Pauline Maclaran also distinguishing their plight from Diana.
She told E! News: “I don’t think [Meghan and Harry] The real interview can be judged in a similar way to the Diana interview, which really makes the public very much against royalty here.
“When Diana did her interviews, it was after they had endured so many other things during that time, so it was really some sort of climax or pinnacle scandal of a series of scandals. confusing, really.
“This time, I think it’s not quite the same and especially because Harry and Meghan have left.”
The co-author of ‘Royal Fever: British Monarchy in Consumer Culture’ also points out that Diana was married to an heir to the throne and gave birth to a future King at the time of her interview with journalist Martin. Bashir made the headlines.
She said, ‘Harry and Meghan seem a little more outgoing.
The expert added: “Meghan has not been around for so long and she is not the mother of the future kings”.
During CBS’s explosive specials show, Meghan claimed that an unnamed royal raised “concerns” about Archie’s son’s skin before the boy was born.
Buckingham Palace made a rare statement in response to Meghan and Harry’s interview by promising to “settle” the pair’s “related” allegations.